Judge Jesus G. Bernal found notice provisions in claims made policies were unambiguous and enforceable as a condition precedent to coverage. The Citrus Course Homeowners Ass’n v. Great Am. Ins. Co., No. 5:15-cv-02443-JGB (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2016). Great American… Continue Reading →
Coverage for a Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation was not subject to a D&O policy’s regulatory claims coverage sublimit, and the insurer could not show that the DOJ investigation was sufficiently related to prior claims to bar coverage. Millennium Laboratories,… Continue Reading →
Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Consumer Fraud Act do not constitute a Privacy Wrongful Act under a medical professional liability policy. Thus, the cyber claims endorsement of the policy did not provide coverage for unsolicited… Continue Reading →
A spreadsheet detailing asserted monetary damages constituted a claim first made against the insured company prior to the policy period, and thus the company was not entitled to coverage under its claims-made policy. Ritrama, Inc. v. HDI-Gerling American Ins. Co.,… Continue Reading →
© 2022 Tressler LLP − Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Tressler Blog Network Bad Faith BulletinCGL DispatchCondo Law WatchLocal Government LowdownPrivacy Risk ReportThe Property Line